|
As pointed out in the Associated Press article regarding Locker's
decision not to forgo his final season of college eligibility, Locker
had submitted his name for consideration to the NFL Collegiate Advisory
Committee, which estimates where a player might be drafted.
Despite a proclamation by ESPN's Todd McShay that Locker would/should/could be
the first overall pick, a league source tells us that Locker didn't receive
a first-round grade from the Advisory Committee.
The source concedes that Locker might have still be drafted in round one given
the value of the position, but the source insists that McShay was flat wrong in
his assessment of Locker.
"That's the problem," the source opined. "McShay is clueless. Up until three
weeks before the 2008 draft, he said that [Kentucky's] Andre Woodson would be a
first-round pick. He went in the sixth and is out of the league."
And the source explained that these opinions come not from the same-old rant by
NFL scouts that guys like McShay and Mel Kiper have the luxury of popping off
with no accountability as long as it all sounds good (the same-old rant has a
significant amount of accuracy, by the way), but from concerns that guys like
McShay do kids a disservice by pumping up their expectations.
"The problem I have with people like McShay saying stupid things is parents and
others who 'advise' these kids think McShay knows what he is talking about," the
source said. "And they believe him before they believe the Advisory Committee.
Then, when the kids go a lot lower than projected they are pissed and/or
depressed. . . . This stuff happens every year and we have to deal with the
broken hearts because people who don't know what they are talking about put
visions of grandeur into young players' heads."
This item isn't intended to be a shot at McShay. But if the Advisory Committee
didn't give a first-round grade to the guy that McShay had at the top of his
board, then something is wrong with this picture. And we're inclined to think
the defect doesn't come from the Committee made up of folks who scout players
for a living -- and whose ongoing careers depend not on their ability to talk
smoothly about their views, but on whether enough of the players whom they
believe to be good players become good players.
| |
|